Skip to content
SiteList

Roundabout Review: strong creator campaign guidance (79/100)

Roundabout scores 79/100, with clear creator analysis and campaign-cost guidance for brand marketers and agencies. Its most material weakness is the absence of a separate public help surface, while the mobile homepage records a 3.62 s LCP against a 2.5 s target.

Reviewed by SiteList Engine · 12 of 13 dimensions · published Reviewed on November 1, 2026

Is this your site?

Claim it

Quick facts

Roundabout is an influencer marketing campaign analysis and quoting site for brands and agencies.

Fact Value
Domain roundabout.pro
Category Influencer marketing campaign analysis, quoting, and execution for brands
Pricing Unknown; price range not supplied
Pages crawled 38
Crawl date 2026-10-21
Evidence
Pages crawled
38
Crawl date
2026-10-21
Pricing model
unknown

Executive summary

Roundabout scores 79/100 because it makes creator evaluation and campaign planning legible to brand-side marketers and agencies. Its audience and messaging are strong at 83.3/100, usability reaches 87.4/100, and accessibility reaches 91/100. The site also records strong technical foundations: technical SEO scores 92.1/100, while risk and stability scores 93.1/100.

The main gap is self-serve support.

Design execution is the other clear constraint at 72/100. Mobile performance needs attention too: the homepage's lab LCP is 3.62 s against a 2.5 s target, while the same run reports 0 ms TBT and 0 CLS.

The result is a commercially clear product with strong evidence structure and a specific support gap to close.

Evidence
Overall score
79/100
Technical SEO
92.1/100
Docs & self-serve help
8.5/100
Mobile homepage LCP
3.62 s; target 2.5 s

01 · First impressions & positioning — three quote scenarios and €99 Pro pricing

Roundabout makes its buyer and workflow clear: brands and agencies can analyze creators, receive three quote scenarios, and run a campaign. The English route describes influencer marketing “without the guesswork,” while the pricing page gives the promise a concrete mechanism: a free workspace, Pro at €99 per month, and campaign work priced at the approved quote. Creator Analysis, Quotes, and Campaigns form a coherent three-part path. The weaker point is distinctiveness: the crawl found no comparison or alternatives pages, and SERP enrichment was unavailable. Make “campaign pricing you can approve before you run it” the short differentiating clause, then support it with a named case study showing quote, final spend, and outcome.

Evidence
Pro workspace price
€99 per month
Quote scenarios
three
Comparison or alternatives pages discovered
none

02 · Audience & messaging — creator-analysis FAQs answer data-limit questions

Roundabout answers the prospect’s first questions with unusual specificity: what the product does, who it serves, what it costs, and how creator analysis works. The Creator Analysis FAQ explains quick versus full analysis, audience-data limits, analysis freshness, brand safety, and profiles outside the existing database. That makes the method easier to understand without overstating certainty. Primary paths to Creator Analysis, Quotes, Campaigns, and Pricing reinforce a brand-marketer and agency audience. The remaining gap is comparative choice. No comparison or alternatives pages were found, and SERP enrichment was unavailable, so visitors are not given a compact framework for choosing Roundabout over spreadsheets, manual negotiation, or another workflow. Add that decision page beside the existing methodology answers.

Evidence
Creator-analysis FAQ questions
how creators are chosen, quick versus full analysis, audience data, freshness, profiles outside the database, and brand safety
Pro price
€99 per month
Comparison or alternatives pages discovered
none

03 · Usability — pricing in one click, Blog in the footer

The core commercial journey is direct: Pricing is reachable from the homepage in one click, the page compares Free at €0, Pro at €99 per month, and quote-led Campaigns CRM, and signup actions recur at useful points. The main discovery friction is recent content. Blog appears in the homepage footer rather than primary navigation, and this detour appeared in all three simulated blog runs. Once reached, the blog is organized with “All 19” and filters for Measurement, Content, Strategy, Industries, and Seasonal. The supplied mobile capture keeps the core offer and signup action visible, with no clipped control evidenced. Promote Blog or Insights into primary or secondary navigation, or add a clear homepage editorial entry point.

Evidence
Blog task detours
all three simulated runs
Blog article count filter
All 19
Pro price
€99 per month

04 · Accessibility — zero missing-alt images, but the login route has no landmark

Roundabout’s marketing pages show a strong semantic baseline: the sampled crawl found zero images missing alt text, zero controls without a detected label or ARIA name, and no positive tabindex values. The public login route is the clearest structural exception. Its rendered facts report no landmarks and no skip link, leaving screen-reader users without the usual shortcut to the main content. Add a semantic main landmark and appropriate surrounding structure, then verify keyboard and assistive-technology navigation. PSI also reports a color-contrast audit score of 0 on one Italian blog article, but the supplied artifact does not identify the failing selector or ratio; reproduce that finding at element level before changing tokens. A separate homepage name-mismatch result also needs confirmation.

Evidence
Images missing alt text in sampled marketing crawl
0
Login landmarks
[]
Login skip link
false
Blog color-contrast audit score
0

05 · Design execution — 13.3px mobile input and three small targets

The visual system is coherent and the homepage scan order is clear, but several mechanical details hold it back. The mobile creator-profile input uses a computed 13.3px font size, below the 16px threshold intended to prevent mobile auto-zoom; its measured height is 44px, so the text size can be raised without changing the control’s overall footprint. The same probe reports three small tap targets, though it does not identify them. The sampled blog page also fails a color-contrast audit, and homepage images lack explicit sizing in PSI findings. The stylesheet inventory contains 355 colors, 60 font sizes, 39 radii, and 96 spacing values; because library and unused rules are included, treat these as drift signals. Fix the input and targets first, then reconcile active tokens.

Evidence
Mobile input font size
13.3px
Mobile input height
44px
Small tap targets
3
Stylesheet color inventory
355 distinct colors

06 · Performance — 3.62 s mobile LCP with 0 ms TBT and 0 CLS

Desktop lab runs are strong, but the mobile homepage is the performance constraint. PageSpeed Insights reports LCP at 3,621.8 ms against the 2.5 s target, while the same run reports 0 ms TBT and 0 CLS. This is lab evidence only because no CrUX field data was returned. PSI also estimates 770 ms of mobile redirect savings, 148 KiB of image-delivery savings, 52 KiB of cache-lifetime opportunity, and 13 blocking requests. The exact LCP node is not identified in the supplied artifact, so capture a trace before choosing an optimization. Then point internal URLs at the final locale path, serve right-sized image variants with stable dimensions, and defer non-critical work.

Evidence
Mobile LCP
3,621.8 ms
Mobile TBT
0 ms
Mobile CLS
0
Mobile image-delivery savings
148 KiB

07 · Writing quality — 40.7-word homepage sentences and a 1,655-word blog index

The strongest copy is concrete: it names Instagram and TikTok, three quote scenarios, real per-market fees, a free workspace, and bounded workflow states. The homepage is harder to scan because its rendered text averages 40.7 words per sentence, with one hero paragraph carrying the platform, quote, campaign, and workspace promises at once. Split that load into a short lead and compact proof points. The blog index is also dense at 1,655 words and a 31.8-word average sentence; keep its category structure but shorten card descriptions to one outcome. The direct voice on product pages is worth preserving. Proof the talk-page promise, resolve duplicated English-home metadata, and add purpose-based alt text to the confirmed image gaps.

Evidence
Homepage average sentence length
40.7 words
Blog index rendered word count
1,655 words
Blog index average sentence length
31.8 words
ROI guide methods
7 proven tracking methods

08 · Decision-support surfaces — €0 Free, €99 Pro, and 26 comparison rows

The pricing page gives visitors three real paths: Free at €0 forever, Pro at €99 monthly or €990 annually, and Campaign CRM through a quote. The labels provide useful directional guidance, but they do not yet defend a plan choice by buyer scenario. Add a compact “Choose this if…” block: occasional or exploratory work for Free, recurring in-house analysis and quoting for Pro, and managed execution for Campaign CRM, with one trade-off beside each. The 26-row comparison table is valuable for verification but makes the first decision a long scan; promote the three to five choice-changing axes above it and group the rest. Campaign CRM remains quote-led, so a starting range or worked example would complete the cost picture.

Evidence
Free price
€0 forever
Pro price
€99 monthly or €990 annually
Comparison table rows
26

09 · Risk & stability — 200-status homepage variants and 3.62 s mobile LCP

The crawl does not establish an active traffic-loss event. Public pages are indexable, robots and sitemap checks are healthy, raw and rendered content match, and the soft-404 probe returns a real 404. The practical cleanup is URL consolidation: /eng/home is captured with canonical /en, while /en/ also returns 200 without a redirect. Choose /en as the single final URL, redirect alternates in one hop, and align internal links and sitemap entries. Two ROI articles also overflow a 390px viewport, and the homepage’s mobile lab LCP is 3.62 s; these are experience risks, not evidence of measured traffic loss. Connect GSC before attributing any change to search systems or a release.

Evidence
/en/ response
200 without redirect
Homepage mobile LCP
3,621.8 ms
ROI article mobile scroll width
473px at a 390px viewport

10 · Editorial QA of content — 24 missing-alt images and duplicate homepage metadata

Roundabout’s editorial system is strongest where it answers real questions. Creator Analysis provides question-shaped content about creator selection and audience data, while the ROI guide promises seven methods and visibly follows that structure. The final-mile QA is less consistent. The crawler confirms duplicate title and meta-description content between /eng/home and /en, 24 images without alt text on the English homepage, and additional image gaps across product, industry, pricing, talk, and blog pages. The talk page also contains an awkward booking sentence: “We'll tell you if it makes sense, which niche to fish in, what it really costs.” Proof that sentence, add localized metadata checks and image-purpose review to the release gate, and reuse the ROI guide’s promise-to-numbered-sections pattern. The evidence does not support an unedited-AI or hallucination claim.

Evidence
English-home images missing alt text
24
Duplicate English-home metadata
title and meta description shared by /eng/home and /en
ROI guide methods
7

11 · Docs & self-serve help — 8.5/100

The public product surface contains useful FAQ answers, but it is not yet a self-serve support system. Creator Analysis explains creator selection, quick versus full analysis, audience-data limits, freshness, profiles outside the database, and brand safety; it also carries FAQPage and BreadcrumbList markup. Publish a searchable help center with a quickstart and task guides for creator analysis, quote generation, campaign handoff, states, and reporting. Make it reachable from the main marketing navigation, and use the existing FAQ as seed content.

Evidence
Docs and self-serve help score
8.5/100
Public docs/help/knowledge-base subtree
none discovered across 38 of 40 page slots
FAQ source
Creator Analysis page with FAQPage and BreadcrumbList markup

12 · Technical SEO — 118 sitemap URLs and 473px article overflow

Roundabout’s technical foundation is healthy. robots.txt allows crawling and declares the sitemap, the verified sitemap contains 118 URLs, the non-existent URL returns a real 404, and HTTP plus bare non-www traffic consolidates to HTTPS www in one hop. Raw and rendered word counts match across all 38 captured pages, and the homepage provides Organization and WebSite JSON-LD. The main defect is mobile article layout: both sampled ROI posts measure 473px of scroll width at a 390px viewport. Fix the shared template for media and tables, then address the 3,621.8 ms mobile homepage LCP. Finally, normalize /en/, /eng/home, canonicals, internal links, and sitemap entries around one English homepage route. No sitewide crawl or indexability blocker was evidenced in the supplied sample.

Evidence
Verified sitemap URLs
118
ROI article scroll width
473px at a 390px viewport
Captured pages with matching raw/rendered word counts
38
Mobile homepage LCP
3,621.8 ms

Verdict — 79/100: strong creator campaign guidance

Roundabout is a strong fit for brand marketing teams and agencies that need creator analysis, campaign quotes, and a clearer path from brief to execution. Its strongest case is practical: the site explains the audience, the workspace, creator analysis, and campaign-cost scenarios in concrete terms.

The priority fixes are equally clear. Add a separate public help surface for self-serve product questions, improve the mobile rendering path to address the 3.62 s LCP, and make Blog easier to discover than its current homepage-footer placement. These changes would address the lowest-scoring support, performance, and content-discovery signals without changing the core offer.

Buyers who want a structured creator and campaign workflow should find enough evidence to start; buyers who expect extensive public documentation should account for the current gap.

Evidence
Overall score
79/100
Design execution
72/100
Docs & self-serve help
8.5/100

Methodology & data notes

This 13-dimension review combines the 38-page crawl from 2026-10-21, the supplied product facts, and the public dimension score table. The crawl covered Roundabout's public marketing surface; pricing remains unknown in the supplied facts, and no Google Search Console access was connected, so no GSC enrichment is included.

Dimension 13, Review-content integrity, is excluded because it is marked not applicable. The review does not turn missing enrichment into a site finding. Read How SiteList scores for the scoring framework and data notes.

Evidence
Review dimensions
13-dimension review
GSC access
false
Excluded dimension
13 · Review-content integrity; not_applicable

Questions buyers actually ask

What's the difference between a quick and a full analysis?

Quick analysis covers a summary, brand safety, potential index, engagement, and view rate against the benchmark. Full analysis adds classification, content preview, analytics over time, collaborations, and commercial data.

Can Roundabout analyze a profile that is not in its database?

Yes. You can paste any public Instagram or TikTok profile. Roundabout downloads and reads the content, then builds an analysis with the same tabs.

What does brand safety mean in Roundabout?

It measures how safe a creator is for a brand using language, topics, sensitive content, and consistency between posts and sponsorships. The score runs from 0 to 100 and includes a plain-language verdict and findings.

How much does an influencer marketing campaign cost?

The cost depends on the creator tier, market, and advertising license. Roundabout applies those ratios to the brief and returns three scenarios with the final price.

How this review was made

SiteList reviewed roundabout.pro on November 1, 2026 — pages, screenshots, performance runs, structured data and public records — then scored it across 12 of the 13 public dimensions. Every claim above is sourced from what we collected; nothing is hand-tuned and the score is never for sale.

Not covered in this write-up: Review-content integrity (not applicable). Dimensions without a score are excluded and their weight is redistributed across the scored ones.

Pending enrichment (data we could not fetch this run): Brand SERP and competitor lookup: no SERP endpoint configured., Direct competitor H1 comparison and current search-result category context., SERP and Reddit voice-of-customer lookup: no SERP endpoint configured., External audience phrasing and direct competitor comparison., Scripted Playwright verification of mobile-menu visibility and registration-link click behavior, Live moderated user testing to validate the simulated paths, Element-level Lighthouse or axe output for the blog contrast failure, Element-level Lighthouse or axe output for the homepage label-content-name mismatch…

Read the full methodology

79/100RoundaboutJump to review