Skip to content
SiteList

Codiga

codiga.io

Unclaimed listing

Is this your site?

Claim itGet your badge

What it does

Codiga provides static code analysis, secure code analysis, automated code reviews, customizable analysis rules, and code snippets for developers in IDEs and CI/CD workflows.

Two ratings

SiteList review score

Clear developer-focused positioning and strong technical foundations. Improve mobile performance and give the site a final editorial pass to remove duplicated and hard-to-scan…

Reviewed on Sep 29, 2026

Why this score? →

Screenshots

Captured during our latest review on Sep 29, 2026

Home · www.codiga.io
Blog · www.codiga.io
About us · www.codiga.io
Blog · www.codiga.io

Pricing details

Basic features are available free; premium and enterprise features are paid. Billed custom. free plan · Basic features are available free to all users; premium and enterprise features are paid.

View source

Buyer questions

Questions buyers actually ask

Who is Codiga for?

Codiga is aimed at developers. Its positioning centers on static code analysis, developer productivity, and security.

How fast is the Codiga site?

Performance is the clearest weakness. The homepage records a 3.7-second mobile largest contentful paint, above Google’s 2.5-second threshold for good performance, alongside render-blocking JavaScript.

Is Codiga accessible?

Accessibility foundations are strong in the sampled evidence: landmarks are present and most images have alt text, with one empty alt attribute reported. Color-contrast failures remain a material design concern.

What should Codiga improve first?

Prioritize mobile performance, then repair editorial hygiene: shorten long single paragraphs, remove duplicated acquisition copy, fix the broken heading level, review time-sensitive messaging, and differentiate duplicate metadata.

Answers are based on SiteList's latest evidence review. Read the full review.

The expert review

Codiga scores 76/100, with clear positioning for developers and strong crawlability, accessibility foundations, and audience alignment. Performance and editorial hygiene are the material weaknesses: mobile LCP is 3.7 seconds, while long paragraphs, duplicated copy, and metadata issues reduce clarity.

76/100: clear product, with performance and editorial gaps

Read the full review

Verified user reviews

0 verified

No reviews yet. The evidence locker is empty.

Reviews from verified users appear here once approved.

Reviews are from the SiteList community. Some reviewers received incentives — disclosed in the review, always. The verdict is never for sale.

Scores across 13 dimensions

Domain
codiga.io
Category
Testing & QA automation
Pricing
Freemium
Platforms
web, desktop
Last checked
Sep 29, 2026
Public dimensions
13

Home

Jevstation screenshot 1 of 4: Home

Jevstation

Score 78 out of 100 — Strong

jevstation.com

JevStation is a web workspace for running Jev and other decision models: users submit a state, ask typed Choice, Score, or Noul questions, and receive structured answers with probability distributions and confidence values. It provides a playground, API access, saved evaluations, credit metering, batch tools, and MCP access.

Home

Ito — AI code review that runs your code screenshot 1 of 4: Home

Ito — AI code review that runs your code

Score 77 out of 100 — Strong

ito.ai

AI-powered code review tool that builds applications on every pull request, runs impacted user flows in isolated environments, and posts video evidence and bug reports directly to the PR.

Home

Greptile screenshot 1 of 4: Home

Greptile

Score 75 out of 100 — Strong

greptile.com

AI-powered code review agent that analyzes pull requests with full repository context, posts findings as PR comments with suggested fixes, and integrates with coding agents for one-click resolution.

Home

Ieltswritingchecker screenshot 1 of 4: Home

Ieltswritingchecker

Score 71 out of 100 — Fair

ieltswritingchecker.org

IELTS Writing Checker provides automated feedback for IELTS Writing Task 1 and Task 2 essays, including estimated scores, criterion feedback, inline corrections, and revision steps.